Ok so in the beginning of the year I said I would do more shows about going green and what that means.

Here are two experts who really do care about your health and who came on my show to talk about what is green and where you may be wasting your money.

They are VERY knowledgeable and taught me a lot. I want to post one of their blogs below to share more about what we need to know that the government has not shared with us.

www.justgreenit.com

http://justgreenit.greennest.com/about/

Your home should be an oasis; a safe place where you go to relax at the end of a long work day, where you spend time with your loved ones, and where you rest and recharge each night as you sleep. But the very place you go to seek comfort and peace may actually be making you sick. As Americans embrace green products, we need to look at not only our eco-footprint, but also how to make our homes natural, healthy havens.

1. Toxic Cleaning Products

For generations we’ve been told that a clean home is a healthy home but one check in your cleaning closet will likely reveal a host of chemicals. You think you’re doing your family a favor by using anti-bacterial wipes and disinfectant sprays but did you know those products contain pesticides? Furniture polish can contain silicone, butane gas and propane. And think of it, kids, by the very nature of their size and because they put everything in their mouths and are always, are especially vulnerable to these chemicals.

Look at the labels on cleaning products and choose ones with ingredients that you can pronounce. There are a growing number of non-toxic brands on the market and most supermarkets now carry at least one type of natural cleaning product. Make your own natural cleaners using basic ingredients like baking soda, vinegar and tea tree oil. Not only will they clean just as well as the store bought products, but they’ll smell better and save you money.

2. Unhealthy Bedding

You get under the covers and lay your head down on your pillow each night but did you know that your bedroom can be filled with formaldehyde, which outgases harmful VOC’s?  Formaldehyde is released from everyday household furnishings and bedding like drapery, bed linens and upholstery, and has been known to cause wheezing, allergic reactions and even serious illness.

Replace old bedding with organic linens, get rid of ‘wrinkle-free’ and other sheets with synthetic additives and get organic cotton sheets. You can also find organic mattresses covers made from natural raw ingredients that will provide an allergen barrier.

3. Poor Indoor Air Quality

The EPA lists indoor air quality as one of the top 5 environmental health risks the U.S. faces today.

The simplest way to improve the air quality is to open windows and let the fresh air in! Unfortunately, sometimes — like in the winter — that’s not an option. What you can do is get an air purifier with a HEPA filter. There are many different models including portable ones that can remove dust, pollens, dander, odors, chemical vapors and more. Also, replace your furnace air filters regularly.

4. Non-filtered Drinking and Bath Water

Chlorine, parasites, and heavy metals may be in your drinking and bath water. Research has shown that chlorine and its assorted byproducts have been linked to serious illnesses like colon and bladder cancer. Most people don’t realize that they can also expose themselves to these contaminants while bathing.

The best way to ensure clean tap water is to install a whole house water filter. For a relatively small investment of under a thousand dollars, you can buy a reverse osmosis water filter system that will make the water from your tap cleaner than bottled water. Another option is installing separate shower head filters and faucet water filters. For either a whole house system or separate shower and countertop water filters, you need to change cartridges on a regular basis.

5. Electromagnetic Radiation

Electricity in our homes and offices is such a part of modern day life that we don’t even think it. Cooking, cleaning, watching TV, faxing, printing, everyday we rely on its convenience. But at what cost? The price we pay extends well beyond money. The more costly price is our health.

Electrical current speeding through miles of wires in our home and office walls creates electromagnetic fields (EMFs). These fields significantly disrupt the sensitive signals with which our brains and nervous systems communicate.

Scientific studies have shown that by reducing electromagnetic radiation from the bedroom, people slept better and even healed faster. Potential sources of electromagnetic radiation include building wiring, and electric appliances like alarm clocks. There are tests that can be performed to find out what circuit breakers and/or electric appliances need to be de-energized to reduce electromagnetic radiation.

Some ways to reduce electromagnetic radiation in your bedroom are to remove or unplug TV’s and radios before going to bed, and to switch to a battery operated alarm clock. You can also turn off the circuit breakers to the bedroom each night.

Because after you consumed sugar (bread, cookies, soda) without fiber, insulin was released is and trying to make the glucose (sugar) convert to immediate energy for your organs and regulating body temperature.

The glucose is stored as glycogen but after it fulfills the need for regulating body temperature and energy for your organs what is left stores as fat. it doesn't take much to perform these processes yet we give it way too much which shoes up on your butt and belly.

Like a dog burying a bone. If he doesn’t have enough to eat he will dig up the bone.

If we eat more and more sugar and there is no immediate need for it to be used for energy we will become fatter and fatter.

Add real butter to a carb like bread and the fat from the butter is transformed into a fatty acid. This means the pancreas will secrete insulin in proportion to the glucose or sugar eaten and even if you’re not going to exercise you will put less strain on the body by not requiring the energy/food eaten to be stored as fat. While this sounds promising, unfortunately it will only work for those who have Not abused their pancreas and most in their 30’s or later have done so by this point

This does not mean you can have all of the fat you want. It is about the balance or ratio of the two. And if you already have a dysfunction pancreas which by your 30’s you most likely do due to the abuse you have given it…adding the fat to the bread will make you gain fat. Well most of us have this issue already from years of beating the pancreas up.

Best way to lose fat? Stop eating all carbs other than veggies. Yes, even for a workout, your body will use its fat stores for energy. No need at all to have any bad carbs whatsoever for regulating body temp or to exercise.

Now if you’re low in body fat and a vigorous exerciser such as a professional athlete like Michael Phelps, the bad carbs will not ad fat since it recognizes the need for  the energy and will use it appropriately. House moms and weekend worries should stay away. why? Look in a mirror

Even if you’re an athlete, unless you’re exercising daily as if you’re about to compete and stay in competition shape, you will be affected like the rest of America who consumes more bad energy foods than needed.

Using my 21 day cleanse can help you regain that youth by adding the high grade nutrients back into your body with the food plan I wrote that compliments the supplements during  this time.

When our gut microflora (bacteria) is disturbed in any way (too few good or too many bad), we become vulnerable to digestive problems and illness. This condition is called Dysbiosis and it often causes yeast (Candida), infections. Yes in men too.

Dysbiosis happens when the gut flora is imbalanced. what causes this imbalance? I listed the top three first of the most common causes for this imbalance of the seven listed.

The over-use of antibiotics, ant-acids, chronic mental/emotional stress, infections, GI surgery, chronic constipation, and food allergies.

When we have too much bacteria we experience an inability to absorb vit B12, vit D, iron, good fat from digesting. And since the small intestine distributes nutrients throughout your body if we don’t break down  carbohydrates before the body is ready to accept them into the large intestine it can result in symptoms like upper GI gas and bloating after a meal.

Using pro-biotics and fiber with each meal will promote the growth of our own healthy bacteria (called prebiotics). They’re cheap and affective without the side affects of medication that addresses the symptom instead of the cause.

For years big pharma, MD’s and nutritionists have been in a battle over who can help the patient correct a deficiency/illness. Some like nutritionists go the extra step and think about how they can help without doing more damage. Some medications do more harm than good when addressing the symptom and creating other issues that weren’t present prior to taking that medication.

If you’ve listened to my show enough you know I present non-bias information in the listeners best interest.

The drug companies? Not so much. They want the almighty dollar while making you believe they’re looking out for you.

You say George give me an example. Okay how about this.

Somewhere in every drug commercial they say something like this. “This medication may cause nausea, dizziness, back pain, bruising and stroke” but the commercial was about toe fungus so you may experience all of those side effects but at least your toe fungus will be gone. SERIOUSLY???? COME ON

Most of us are not aware of the power food and professional grade supplements can have because there isn’t enough money being poured into commercials and educating use as well as doctors about the benefits. Even if someone has enough money, the drug companies would squash them cause they have way too much to lose.

Another example? How about the article in Newsweek I believe it was in 2008 where they showed omitted information about the studies performed by big pharma on statin drugs for lowering cholesterol? They have never been shown to prevent heart attacks and they rob your body of the very nutrient that protects your heart in the first place called CoQ10.

For every medication you take you lose vital nutrients’ that can bring about other conditions. Find out the nutrients lost and replace them while on the medication.

That would be ideal for those who are on medication now. But if you’re unaware of the nutrients you're being robbed of while on medication then you may experience other ill affects you didn’t have prior to beginning that medication therapy and may dismiss it blaming those new issues on age.

Now you may say George you’re talking about conspiracy here, come one get real.

Okay now we’re getting into the reason I am writing this. It’s to show you once again without bias information that people who omit vital information from a study lose credibility. This adds creds to those who all along had your best interest at hand by researching beyond traditional ways of learning and not accepting a doctors word.

Most doctors don’t have time to perform their own studies nor do they have time to research all day long so they rely on drug companies to educate them. Their fault? Or the drug company? I’d say both must accept responsibility.

The really good news is that there are hundreds of MD’s who recognize we have more meditation today than we ever had yet we are sicker in America than we’ve ever been. These docs are actually going back to school and getting nutrition degrees to better serve their patients. Yes we’re alive longer but we are just extending life, not necessarily are we healthy.

I have many friends who are doctors and they are on board 100% with the info I provide on my blog and radio show. Why? Because they have done their research beyond the scope of the drug companies. It's time for the child to leave from under the roof of big pharma and go out into the world and learn learn for himself.

Read below and make a call one way or the other about the truth finally being revealed about researcher MD Max Gerson.

The Hidden Wikipedia: How to Find Deleted Material about Nutritional Medicine

(OMNS, May 11, 2010) There is nothing quite like a paper trail, and Wikipedia has one. Consequently, you can read for yourself all the material that has been added, and then deleted.

For example: Wikipedia's page about Max Gerson, M.D., is http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Max_Gerson<http://www.cihfimediaservices.org/12all/lt/t_go.php?i=74&e=MjY0NTg=&l=-http--en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Max_Gerson>.

The doctor is widely known for the nutritional cancer therapy that bears his name. Gerson's principal biographer is his grandson, Howard Straus

http://www.doctoryourself.com/gersonbio.htm<http://www.cihfimediaservices.org/12all/lt/t_go.php?i=74&e=MjY0NTg=&l=-http--www.doctoryourself.com/gersonbio.htm>.

Mr. Straus talks about some interesting experiences he has had with Wikipedia bias:"Some years ago, on seeing that the pages for Dr. Max Gerson and the Gerson herapy were only stubs (short place-holders with little information on them), I took it upon myself to flesh out the pages. I thought Wikipedia was fairly neutral on balance, so I put in all the information that I could, and kept it factual with references, citations, and literature links.

"Within a month, the following had happened:

"The information was labeled as "biased" and "unreliable" because I am Dr. Gerson's grandson and biographer. There appeared a big red flag at the top of the article labeling the articles neutrality "dubious." The photograph I posted was removed. Provable, referenced facts, with dates and places, all suddenly became "claims," even quotes from no less than Nobel Laureate

Albert Schweitzer, M.D., who famously said: *"I see in Dr. Max Gerson one of the most eminent geniuses in medical history."* Dr. Schweitzer and his wife were patients of Dr. Gerson, making this a first-hand account from a rather reliable source.

"All my links, references and citations were removed. They were replaced by links to the American Cancer Society and National Cancer Institute, which offer only criticism of the Gerson Therapy. Even quotations from published scientific papers were removed. Attempts to rectify these actions were immediately overwritten.

"It's easy enough to show the progression of the pages, since Wikipedia displays former edits on request, dated and documented. One can verify this by clicking on the "History" tab at the top of the Max Gerson page, and looking at 2005 and before. My editing is archived at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/69.109.140.164<http://www.cihfimediaservices.org/12all/lt/t_go.php?i=74&e=MjY0NTg=&l=-http--en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/69.109.140.164>

and also

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Howard_Straus<http://www.cihfimediaservices.org/12all/lt/t_go.php?i=74&e=MjY0NTg=&l=-http--en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Howard_Straus>

"A second Wikipedia page, specific to the Gerson Therapy, has been * completely* removed.

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Gerson_therapy&redirect=no<http://www.cihfimediaservices.org/12all/lt/t_go.php?i=74&e=MjY0NTg=&l=-http--en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php--Q-title--E-Gerson_therapy--A-redirect--E-no>.

To see something of what happened, you can click the "History" tab here as well."

The OMNS adds just one other intriguing statement about Dr. Gerson's work that is probably too "unreliable" to be seen on Wikipedia:

*"I know of one patient who turned to Gerson Therapy having been told she was suffering from terminal cancer and would not survive another course of chemotherapy. Happily, seven years later, she is alive and well. So it is vital that, rather than dismissing such experiences, we should furtherinvestigate the beneficial nature of these treatments."* (H.R.H. Charles, Prince of Wales)

Max Gerson is not the only nutritionally-oriented physician whose work is slanted or censored at Wikipedia. Others include Matthias Rath, M.D., and Robert F. Cathcart III, M.D. *Matthias Rath, M.D.*

Dr. Rath coauthored a number of papers with Linus Pauling. (1-8) They discussed high-dose vitamin therapy for cardiovascular disease. To see whatis going on at Wikipedia concerning him:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Matthias_Rath<http://www.cihfimediaservices.org/12all/lt/t_go.php?i=74&e=MjY0NTg=&l=-http--en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Matthias_Rath>

Paul Anthony Taylor, a supporter of Dr. Rath, comments: "Instead of providing free access to the sum of all human knowledge, as is its supposed aim, Wikipedia would appear to be just another way of supporting the scientific, political and social status quo. In a sense, however, the game is already up for Wikipedia. The official exams watchdog in the UK, Ofqual,

recently stated that schoolchildren should avoid it as it is not "authoritative or accurate" and in some cases "may be completely untrue"

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/education/6943325/Schoolchildren-told-to-avoid-Wikipedia.html<http://www.cihfimediaservices.org/12all/lt/t_go.php?i=74&e=MjY0NTg=&l=-http--www.telegraph.co.uk/education/6943325/Schoolchildren-told-to-avoid-Wikipedia.html>

Believe it or not, *one of Wikipedia's contributors is the CIA, and they are not just updating their own entries, either*.

http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2007/08/16/2007049.htm<http://www.cihfimediaservices.org/12all/lt/t_go.php?i=74&e=MjY0NTg=&l=-http--www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2007/08/16/2007049.htm>

When it comes to nutritional therapies, you won't currently find much of it on Wikipedia."

*Robert F. Cathcart, M.D.*

*The Wikipedia page for this physician has been deleted.*

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Robert_Cathcart<http://www.cihfimediaservices.org/12all/lt/t_go.php?i=74&e=MjY0NTg=&l=-http--en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Robert_Cathcart>

Why? Because Dr. Cathcart "does not meet notability criteria per WP:BIO

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:BIO<http://www.cihfimediaservices.org/12all/lt/t_go.php?i=74&e=MjY0NTg=&l=-http--en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:BIO>"

and "a quick google search shows up no reliable hits for this subject." indeed? It appears that someone was not looking. Orthopedic surgeon Robert F. Cathcart III is the inventor of the Cathcart Elliptical Orthocentric Endoprosthesis, a replacement hip-ball joint still in widespread use today after 37 years.

http://www.orthomed.com/pros.pdf<http://www.cihfimediaservices.org/12all/lt/t_go.php?i=74&e=MjY0NTg=&l=-http--www.orthomed.com/pros.pdf>

Some physicians report it to be superior to other similar devices.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2661497<http://www.cihfimediaservices.org/12all/lt/t_go.php?i=74&e=MjY0NTg=&l=-http--www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2661497>

That alone qualifies him as notable, and invalidates the deletion of his page at Wikipedia. In addition, Linus Pauling personally singled out Dr. Cathcart for recognition for his nutritional knowledge as early as 1978. (9)

Possibly, just possibly, the real reason Dr. Cathcart is deleted from Wikipedia has much more to do with his outspoken advocacy of very high doses of vitamin C to treat viral illnesses.

http://www.doctoryourself.com/cathcart_thirdface.html<http://www.cihfimediaservices.org/12all/lt/t_go.php?i=74&e=MjY0NTg=&l=-http--www.doctoryourself.com/cathcart_thirdface.html>

and either

http://www.doctoryourself.com/titration.html<http://www.cihfimediaservices.org/12all/lt/t_go.php?i=74&e=MjY0NTg=&l=-http--www.doctoryourself.com/titration.html>or

http://www.orthomed.com/titrate.htm<http://www.cihfimediaservices.org/12all/lt/t_go.php?i=74&e=MjY0NTg=&l=-http--www.orthomed.com/titrate.htm>

Here is all the deleted material on Dr. Cathcart:

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Robert_Cathcart&action=history<http://www.cihfimediaservices.org/12all/lt/t_go.php?i=74&e=MjY0NTg=&l=-http--en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php--Q-title--E-Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Robert_Cathcart--A-action--E-history>

Take a look and decide for yourself.

*For More Information:*

*Max Gerson, M.D.* ?Complete bibliography of Dr. Gerson's publications:

http://www.doctoryourself.com/bib_gerson.html<http://www.cihfimediaservices.org/12all/lt/t_go.php?i=74&e=MjY0NTg=&l=-http--www.doctoryourself.com/bib_gerson.html>

Extensive list of papers about the Gerson Therapy:

http://www.doctoryourself.com/bib_gerson_therapy.html<http://www.cihfimediaservices.org/12all/lt/t_go.php?i=74&e=MjY0NTg=&l=-http--www.doctoryourself.com/bib_gerson_therapy.html>

For free access to a documentary on the Gerson Therapy:

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-7357629140536485998<http://www.cihfimediaservices.org/12all/lt/t_go.php?i=74&e=MjY0NTg=&l=-http--video.google.com/videoplay--Q-docid--E--7357629140536485998>

A review of this film, from J Orthomolecular Med, 2006:

http://www.doctoryourself.com/gersonmovie.html<http://www.cihfimediaservices.org/12all/lt/t_go.php?i=74&e=MjY0NTg=&l=-http--www.doctoryourself.com/gersonmovie.html>

Additional Reading:

http://www.doctoryourself.com/gersontherapy.html<http://www.cihfimediaservices.org/12all/lt/t_go.php?i=74&e=MjY0NTg=&l=-http--www.doctoryourself.com/gersontherapy.html>

http://www.doctoryourself.com/charlotte.html<http://www.cihfimediaservices.org/12all/lt/t_go.php?i=74&e=MjY0NTg=&l=-http--www.doctoryourself.com/charlotte.html>

*Matthias Rath, M.D.* ?Papers coauthored with Linus Pauling:

1. Rath M, Pauling L. Immunological evidence for the accumulation of lipoprotein(a) in the atherosclerotic lesion of the hypoascorbemic guinea pig. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990 Dec;87(23):9388-90. PMID: 2147514

2. Rath M, Pauling L. Hypothesis: lipoprotein(a) is a surrogate for ascorbate. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990 Aug;87(16):6204-7. Erratum in: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1991 Dec 5;88(24):11588. PMID: 2143582

3. Rath M, Pauling L. Solution To the Puzzle of Human Cardiovascular Disease: Its Primary Cause Is Ascorbate Deficiency Leading to the Deposition of Lipoprotein(a) and Fibrinogen/Fibrin in the Vascular Wall. J Orthomolecular Med, Vol 6, 3&4th Quarters, 1991, p 125.

4. Pauling L, Rath M. An Orthomolecular Theory of Human Health and Disease. J Orthomolecular Med, Vol 6, 3&4th Quarters, 1991, p 135.

5. Rath M, Pauling L. Apoprotein(a) Is An Adhesive Protein. J Orthomolecular Med, Vol 6, 3&4th Quarters, 1991, p 139.

6. Rath M, Pauling L. Case Report: Lysine/Ascorbate Related Amelioration of Angina Pectoris. J Orthomolecular Med, Vol 6, 3&4th Quarters, 1991, p 144.

7. Rath M, Pauling L. A Unified theory of Human Cardiovascular Disease Leading the Way To the Abolition of This Diseases As A Cause for HumanMortality. J Orthomolecular Med, Vol 7, First Quarter 1992, p 5.

8. Rath M, Pauling L. Plamin-induced Proteolysis and the Role of Apoprotein(a), Lysine and Synthetic Lysine Analogs. J Orthomolecular Med, Vol 7, First Quarter 1992, p 17.

Dr. Rath's Assessment of Wikipedia:

http://www4.dr-rath-foundation.org/THE_FOUNDATION/wiki_rath/how_the_facts_arent_welcome_on_wikipedia.html<http://www.cihfimediaservices.org/12all/lt/t_go.php?i=74&e=MjY0NTg=&l=-http--www4.dr-rath-foundation.org/THE_FOUNDATION/wiki_rath/how_the_facts_arent_welcome_on_wikipedia.html>

*Robert F. Cathcart, M.D.* ?Reference 9. Pauling L. Robert Fulton Cathcart III, M.D., an orthomolecular physician. The Linus Pauling Institute of Science and Medicine Newsletter, 1(4):1-3 Fall 1978. Free download of article:

http://www.orthomed.com/PDF/pauling.pdf<http://www.cihfimediaservices.org/12all/lt/t_go.php?i=74&e=MjY0NTg=&l=-http--www.orthomed.com/PDF/pauling.pdf>

Short biography of Dr. Cathcart:

http://orthomolecular.org/hof/2008/cathcart.html<http://www.cihfimediaservices.org/12all/lt/t_go.php?i=74&e=MjY0NTg=&l=-http--orthomolecular.org/hof/2008/cathcart.html>His extensive website on vitamin C therapeutics:

http://www.orthomed.com/<http://www.cihfimediaservices.org/12all/lt/t_go.php?i=74&e=MjY0NTg=&l=-http--www.orthomed.com/>

Bibliography of his publications with links to full-text articles:

http://www.doctoryourself.com/biblio_cathcart.html<http://www.cihfimediaservices.org/12all/lt/t_go.php?i=74&e=MjY0NTg=&l=-http--www.doctoryourself.com/biblio_cathcart.html>